|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
a Centre de
Pneumologie, Hôpital Laval, Ste-Foy, Québec, Canada, b Department of Medicine, University of
Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, c Department of Clinical Epidemiology and
Biostatistics and Department of Medicine, McMaster University,
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Correspondence to: Dr Y Lacasse, Centre de Pneumologie, Hôpital Laval, 2725 Chemin Ste-Foy, Ste-Foy, P. Quebec, G1V 4G5, Canada.
Received 23 October 1998; Returned to authors 12 January 1999; Revised version received 1 April 1999; Accepted for publication 10 June 1999
BACKGROUND
Persisting
controversy surrounds the use of transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy
(TNAB) stemming from its uncertain diagnostic accuracy. A systematic
review and meta-analysis was therefore conducted to evaluate the
accuracy of TNAB for the diagnosis of solitary or multiple localised
pulmonary lesions.
METHODS
Searches for English
literature papers in Index Medicus (1963-1965) and Medline
(1966-1996) were performed and the bibliographies of the retrieved
articles were systematically reviewed. Articles evaluating the accuracy
of TNAB in series of consecutive patients presenting with solitary or
multiple pulmonary lesions were considered. Only papers in which
90% of patients were given a final diagnosis according to an
appropriate reference standard were included in the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 48 studies were included and five meta-analyses were conducted according
to four diagnostic thresholds. From the pooled sensitivity and
specificity corresponding to each diagnostic threshold, associated
likelihood ratios (LRs) were derived for malignant disease as follows:
(1) malignant versus all other categories, LR = 72; (2) malignant or
suspicious versus all others, LR = 49; (3) suspicious versus all
categories but malignant, LR = 15; (4) benign versus all others, LR = 0.07; and (5) specific benign diagnosis versus all others, LR = 0.005. Differences in methodological quality of the studies, needle types, or
whether a cytopathologist participated in the procedure failed to
explain the heterogeneity of the results found in almost every
meta-analysis. Given a 50% probability of malignancy prior to the
TNAB, post-test probabilities of malignancy upon receiving the results
would be malignant, 99%; suspicious, 94%; non-specific benign, 7%;
and benign with a specific diagnosis, 0.6%.
CONCLUSIONS
Given the
intermediate pre-test probabilities that would probably lead to
performing TNAB, findings of "malignant" or of a specific diagnosis
of a benign condition provide definitive results. Findings of
"suspicious" markedly increase the probability of malignancy, and
"benign" markedly decreases it but may not be considered definitive.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A O Soubani The evaluation and management of the solitary pulmonary nodule Postgrad. Med. J., September 1, 2008; 84(995): 459 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Rivera and A. C. Mehta Initial Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition) Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 131S - 148S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. T. Winer-Muram The solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 34 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. S. Chandan, K. Zimmerman, P. Baker, E. Scalzetti, and K. K. Khurana Usefulness of Core Roll Preparations in Immediate Assessment of Neoplastic Lung Lesions: Comparison to Conventional CT Scan-Guided Lung Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3): 739 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Lacasse, J. Plante, S. Martel, and B. Raby Transthoracic needle biopsy in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules: a survey of canadian physicians J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2003; 126(3): 761 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. B. Tan, K. R. Flaherty, E. A. Kazerooni, and M. D. Iannettoni The Solitary Pulmonary Nodule Chest, January 1, 2003; 123(1_suppl): 89S - 96S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schreiber and D. C. McCrory Performance Characteristics of Different Modalities for Diagnosis of Suspected Lung Cancer: Summary of Published Evidence Chest, January 1, 2003; 123(1_suppl): 115S - 128S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C M Richardson, K S Pointon, A R Manhire, and J T Macfarlane Percutaneous lung biopsies: a survey of UK practice based on 5444 biopsies Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2002; 75(897): 731 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Wong, T. Stefanec, K. Brown, and D. A. White Role of Fine-Needle Aspirates of Focal Lung Lesions in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Chest, February 1, 2002; 121(2): 527 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Additional articles abstracted in ACP Journal Club Evid. Based Med., May 1, 2000; 5(3): 67 - 67. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |