Thorax

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guhan, A R
Right arrow Articles by Tattersfield, A E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guhan, A R
Right arrow Articles by Tattersfield, A E
Thorax 2000;55:650-656 ( August )

Systemic effects of formoterol and salmeterol: a dose-response comparison in healthy subjects

A R Guhan, S Cooper, J Oborne, S Lewis, J Bennett, A E Tattersfield

Division of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1 PB, UK

Correspondence to: Professor A E Tattersfield email: anne.tattersfield{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Received 9 December 1999; Returned to authors 24 March 2000; Revised version received 3 April 2000; Accepted for publication 19 April 2000

BACKGROUND---The main adverse effects of inhaled long acting beta 2 agonists relate to their systemic activity. The systemic effects seen over eight hours after inhalation of three doses of salmeterol and formoterol were therefore compared in normal subjects.
METHODS---A double blind, randomised, crossover study was carried out in 16 healthy subjects who inhaled formoterol 24, 48 and 96 µg (via Turbuhaler®), salmeterol 100, 200 and 400 µg (via Diskhaler®), or placebo on separate days. Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and plasma potassium and glucose concentrations were measured for eight hours following each drug and mean values were used to plot the time course of change after each dose. Mean maximum (or minimum) absolute values were used to construct dose-response curves to calculate the relative dose potency of the two drugs. Lunch was taken after the four hour readings and, since this caused additional changes to the main outcome measures, data from the first four hours are also presented in a post hoc analysis.
RESULTS---Both salmeterol and formoterol caused an early dose dependent increase in heart rate and glucose concentrations and a fall in diastolic blood pressure and plasma potassium concentration; formoterol also caused an early increase in systolic blood pressure. The cardiovascular effects occurred more rapidly than the metabolic effects and the response to formoterol was faster than that of salmeterol, apart from the glycaemic response. The effects of salmeterol were slightly more prolonged than those of formoterol, although some dose related effects were apparent at eight hours with both drugs. The relative dose potency for formoterol compared with salmeterol at four and eight hours for the different end points excluding systolic blood pressure ranged from 1.6 to 7.0 after adjusting for baseline values. Relative dose potencies (95% CI) for maximum heart rate and plasma potassium concentrations were 4.1 (3.0 to 5.6) and 5.8 (4.1 to 8.6) over four hours and 2.4 (1.2 to 3.8) and 3.0 (1.2 to 5.7) over eight hours.
CONCLUSIONS---Formoterol and salmeterol cause dose related changes in heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, and plasma glucose and potassium concentrations. Formoterol has a more rapid onset for most end points whereas salmeterol has slightly more prolonged activity. Both drugs have a relatively modest therapeutic window. The relative dose potencies of the two drugs for the main end points were similar to the fourfold difference in recommended doses. Some differences in the pharmacological profile of the two drugs emerged and are as yet unexplained.


Keywords: beta 2 agonist; formoterol; salmeterol; systemic effects; dose response


© 2000 by Thorax



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory DiseaseHome page
B. Lindmark
Review: Differences in the pharmacodynamics of budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone reflect differences in their therapeutic usefulness in asthma
Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease, October 1, 2008; 2(5): 279 - 299.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
K. Najafizadeh, H. Sohrab Pour, M. Ghadyanee, M. Shiehmorteza, M. Jamali, and S. Majdzadeh
A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the role of formoterol in the management of acute asthma
Emerg. Med. J., May 1, 2007; 24(5): 317 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P. J. Barnes
Scientific rationale for using a single inhaler for asthma control
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2007; 29(3): 587 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
C. Battram, S. J. Charlton, B. Cuenoud, M. R. Dowling, R. A. Fairhurst, D. Farr, J. R. Fozard, J. R. Leighton-Davies, C. A. Lewis, L. McEvoy, et al.
In Vitro and in Vivo Pharmacological Characterization of 5-[(R)-2-(5,6-Diethyl-indan-2-ylamino)-1-hydroxy-ethyl]-8-hydroxy-1H-quinolin-2-one (Indacaterol), a Novel Inhaled beta2 Adrenoceptor Agonist with a 24-h Duration of Action
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2006; 317(2): 762 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
E. P. Rutten, F. M. Franssen, M. P. Engelen, E. F. Wouters, N. E. Deutz, and A. M. Schols
Greater whole-body myofibrillar protein breakdown in cachectic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2006; 83(4): 829 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
K. F. Rabe, E. Pizzichini, B. Stallberg, S. Romero, A. M. Balanzat, T. Atienza, P. A. Lier, and C. Jorup
Budesonide/Formoterol in a Single Inhaler for Maintenance and Relief in Mild-to-Moderate Asthma: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.
Chest, February 1, 2006; 129(2): 246 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. C. KIPS and R. A. PAUWELS
Long-acting Inhaled beta 2-Agonist Therapy in Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2001; 164(6): 923 - 932.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society