Thorax

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Osman, L M
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, J G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Osman, L M
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, J G
Thorax 2001;56:138-142 ( February )

Patient weighting of importance of asthma symptoms

L M Osmana, L McKenzieb, J Cairnsb, J A R Friendc, D J Goddenc, J S Leggec, J G Douglasc

a Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK, b Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK, c Respiratory Medicine Unit, Aberdeen Royal Hospitals, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK

Correspondence to: Dr L M Osman l.osman{at}abdn.ac.uk

Received 26 April 2000; Returned to authors 12 July 2000; Revised version received 2 October 2000; Accepted for publication 30 October 2000

BACKGROUND---Quality of life measures are increasingly important in evaluating outcomes in asthma. If some asthma symptoms are more troublesome to patients than others, this may affect their contribution to outcome measures. This study was designed to assess the relative importance of common symptoms in adults with asthma.
METHODS---A postal survey using conjoint analysis was performed in 272 adults attending hospital outpatient clinics with moderately severe asthma. Patients were asked to chose between "symptom scenarios" offering different combinations of levels of five common asthma symptoms over one week. Two versions of the questionnaire were used with identical scenarios presenting symptoms in different orders. Different patients answered the two versions. Regression analysis was used to calculate symptom weights for daytime cough, breathlessness, wheeze and chest tightness, and sleep disturbance.
RESULTS---Symptom order, percentage predicted peak expiratory flow (PEF), and symptoms in the week before the survey did not influence the choice of scenario. In both questionnaires patients were more likely to choose scenarios with low levels of cough and breathlessness than low sleep disturbance, wheeze or chest tightness. Regression weights for cough (-0.52) and breathlessness (-0.49) were twice those of wheeze (-0.25), chest tightness (-0.27), and sleep disturbance (-0.25). For 12% of patients cough dominated patient preferences, regardless of all other symptoms. Age was inversely related to weight given by patients to breathlessness.
CONCLUSIONS---The prominence of cough among other asthma symptoms was unexpected. Daytime cough and breathlessness had greater impact for patients than wheeze or sleep disturbance. Age influenced symptom burden, with younger patients giving greater weight to breathlessness than older patients. Conjoint analysis appears to be a useful method for establishing the relative importance of common symptoms.


Keywords: conjoint analysis; cough; asthma; quality of life


© 2001 by Thorax



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
J. M. Marchant, P. A. Newcombe, E. F. Juniper, J. K. Sheffield, S. L. Stathis, and A. B. Chang
What Is the Burden of Chronic Cough for Families?
Chest, August 1, 2008; 134(2): 303 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ERRHome page
L. M. Osman and M. E. Hyland
Patient needs and medication styles in COPD
Eur. Respir. Rev., December 1, 2005; 14(96): 89 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J. Haughney, M. R. Partridge, C. Vogelmeier, T. Larsson, R. Kessler, E. Stahl, R. Brice, and C-G. Lofdahl
Exacerbations of COPD: quantifying the patient's perspective using discrete choice modelling
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2005; 26(4): 623 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C. R. Jenkins, F. C. K. Thien, J. R. Wheatley, and H. K. Reddel
Traditional and patient-centred outcomes with three classes of asthma medication
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2005; 26(1): 36 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. Johansson, B. Stallberg, G. Tornling, S. Andersson, G. S. Karlsson, K. Falt, and F. Berggren
Asthma Treatment Preference Study: A Conjoint Analysis of Preferred Drug Treatments
Chest, March 1, 2004; 125(3): 916 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
J Ratcliffe, R Van Haselen, M Buxton, K Hardy, J Colehan, and M Partridge
Assessing patients' preferences for characteristics associated with homeopathic and conventional treatment of asthma: a conjoint analysis study
Thorax, June 1, 2002; 57(6): 503 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society