| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
1 Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
2 Respiratory Medicine Unit, Aberdeen Royal Hospitals, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK
3 Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to
Dr L M Osman, Chest Clinic, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK;
l.osman{at}abdn.ac.uk
Background: There is still debate over the benefit of self-management programmes for adults with asthma. A brief self-management programme given during a hospital admission for acute asthma was tested to determine whether it would reduce readmission.
Method: A randomised controlled trial was performed in 280 adult patients with acute asthma admitted over 29 months. Patients on the self-management programme (SMP) received 40–60 minutes of education supporting a written self-management plan. Control patients received standard care (SC).
Results: One month after discharge SMP patients were more likely than SC patients to report no daytime wheeze (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5 to 5.3), no night disturbance (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.5), and no activity limitation (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.9 to 2.7). Over 12 months 17% of SMP patients were re-admitted compared with 27% of SC patients (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 1.0). Among first admission patients, OR readmission (SMP v SC) was 0.2 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.7), p<0.01. For patients with a previous admission, OR readmission was 0.8 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.6), p=0.6. SMP patients were more likely than SC patients to be prescribed inhaled steroids at discharge (99% v 92%, p=0.03), oral steroids (98% v 90%, p=0.06), and to have hospital follow up (98% v 84%, p<0.01) but adjustment for these differences did not diminish the effect of the self-management programme.
Conclusions: A brief self-management programme during hospital admission reduced post discharge morbidity and readmission for adult asthma patients. The benefit of the programme may have been greater for patients admitted for the first time. The programme also had a small but significant effect on medical management at discharge.
Keywords: asthma; self-management; readmission
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J M FitzGerald and P G Gibson Asthma exacerbations {middle dot} 4: Prevention. Thorax, November 1, 2006; 61(11): 992 - 999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Nathan, L. Pearce, C. Field, N. Dotesio-Eyres, L. D. Sharples, F. Cafferty, and C. M. Laroche A Randomized Controlled Trial of Follow-up of Patients Discharged From the Hospital Following Acute Asthma: Best Performed by Specialist Nurse or Doctor? Chest, July 1, 2006; 130(1): 51 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Action plans in asthma DTB, December 1, 2005; 43(12): 91 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Becker, C. Lemiere, D. Berube, L.-P. Boulet, F. M. Ducharme, M. FitzGerald, T. Kovesi, and on behalf of The Asthma Guidelines Working Group o Summary of recommendations from the Canadian Asthma Consensus Guidelines, 2003 Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 13, 2005; 173(6_suppl): S3 - S11. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M R Partridge Written asthma action plans Thorax, February 1, 2004; 59(2): 87 - 88. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Griffiths, G. Foster, N. Barnes, S. Eldridge, H. Tate, S. Begum, M. Wiggins, C. Dawson, A. E. Livingstone, M. Chambers, et al. Specialist nurse intervention to reduce unscheduled asthma care in a deprived multiethnic area: the east London randomised controlled trial for high risk asthma (ELECTRA) BMJ, January 17, 2004; 328(7432): 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (25 Oct 02 to 17 Jan 03) Evid. Based Nurs., April 1, 2003; 6(2): e1 - 7. [Full Text]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
